Two HMDS-treated hydrophobic fumed silica grades with similar BET surface area but meaningful differences in methanol wettability, carbon content, and…
Two HMDS-treated hydrophobic fumed silica grades with similar BET surface area but meaningful differences in methanol wettability, carbon content, and cure-system compatibility.
~110 m²/g BET surface areaHMDS Surface treatment chemistry0.7–1.0% Carbon content range40–60% Methanol wettability range
Both SEMISIL R620 and AEROSIL R972 are surface-modified with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), which reacts with isolated and geminal silanol groups on the fumed silica surface to graft trimethylsilyl (–Si(CH₃)₃) groups. This reaction converts hydrophilic Si–OH sites into hydrophobic methyl-terminated surfaces. The base oxide for both grades is a standard 200 m²/g hydrophilic fumed silica — SEMISIL 200 and AEROSIL 200 respectively — which after HMDS treatment yields a post-treatment BET of approximately 110 ± 20 m²/g. The degree of silanol conversion depends on HMDS stoichiometry, reaction temperature (typically 250–350 °C in gas-phase processes), and residence time. Higher conversion yields lower residual silanol density and stronger hydrophobicity, measured as methanol wettability.
Methanol wettability quantifies the minimum methanol-water concentration needed to wet the treated silica surface — higher values indicate stronger hydrophobicity. AEROSIL R972 typically specifies a methanol wettability of ≥40%, with batch averages near 42–48%. SEMISIL R620 targets a slightly tighter specification window around 45–55%, reflecting a marginally higher degree of surface methyl coverage. Carbon content — a proxy for total organic surface coverage — runs 0.7–0.9% for R972 and 0.8–1.0% for R620. In practice, this 0.1–0.2% carbon difference translates to roughly 5–10% more trimethylsilyl groups per nm² on R620, which can improve moisture resistance in sealant and adhesive formulations exposed to high-humidity environments.
HMDS-treated grades are broadly compatible with condensation-cure (tin- and titanate-catalyzed) and addition-cure (platinum-catalyzed) silicone systems because trimethylsilyl groups do not poison platinum catalysts or consume crosslinker. Both R620 and R972 perform well in RTV-1 and RTV-2 silicone sealants at 4–8 wt% loading for thixotropy. However, in peroxide-cure systems above 160 °C, the slightly higher methyl density on R620 can generate marginally more volatile methyl radicals during decomposition — formulators using dicumyl peroxide (DCP) cure should verify final crosslink density at \>6 wt% loading. In epoxy and unsaturated polyester systems, both grades provide anti-settling at 1–3 wt% without interfering with amine or MEKP cure chemistry.
For thixotropy in solvent-based coatings and adhesives, both grades deliver comparable yield stress at equivalent loading. R620 shows a slight edge in low-polarity systems (xylene, toluene, aliphatic hydrocarbons) due to its higher methyl coverage, which improves initial dispersion and reduces structure-building time by approximately 10–15%. R972 remains the incumbent standard with broader global availability and established regulatory dossiers (REACH, TSCA, FDA indirect food contact). Price-sensitive formulators should note that R620 typically prices 15–25% below R972 at equivalent quality, making it attractive for high-volume applications in silicone sealants, gel coats, and industrial adhesives where the Evonik specification is not explicitly mandated by end customers.
The table below summarizes key specification differences between SEMISIL R620 and AEROSIL R972. Both grades share the same base treatment chemistry and target similar applications, but differ in tightness of specification windows and pricing.
| Property | SEMISIL R620 | AEROSIL R972 | Test Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base oxide | SEMISIL 200 (hydrophilic) | AEROSIL 200 (hydrophilic) | — |
| Surface treatment | HMDS (hexamethyldisilazane) | HMDS (hexamethyldisilazane) | — |
| BET surface area | 100–130 m²/g | 90–130 m²/g | ISO 9277 |
| Carbon content | 0.8–1.0% | 0.7–0.9% | Combustion analysis |
| Methanol wettability | 45–55% | ≥40% (typical 42–48%) | Wettability test |
| pH (4% dispersion) | 3.5–5.5 | 3.6–5.6 | ISO 787-9 |
| Loss on drying (2h, 105 °C) | ≤1.0% | ≤0.5% | ISO 787-2 |
| Tamped density | ~50 g/L | ~50 g/L | ISO 787-11 |
| Typical loading (thixotropy) | 2–6 wt% | 2–6 wt% | Application-dependent |
| Relative price index | 75–85 | 100 (reference) | — |
SEMISIL R620 matches AEROSIL R972 in HMDS treatment chemistry and thixotropic performance, with slightly higher methyl coverage (0.8–1.0% C vs 0.7–0.9% C) and a 15–25% cost advantage — making it a technically equivalent, cost-effective alternative for formulators not locked into an Evonik-only specification.
Both are HMDS-treated hydrophobic fumed silica grades with ~110 m²/g BET surface area. SEMISIL R620 has marginally higher carbon content (0.8–1.0% vs 0.7–0.9%) indicating greater methyl coverage, and typically costs 15–25% less than AEROSIL R972 at equivalent quality.
Yes, both grades are drop-in compatible for RTV-1 and RTV-2 silicone sealants at standard 4–8 wt% loading. They share the same HMDS surface chemistry and do not poison platinum catalysts or interfere with tin-catalyzed condensation cure systems.
Methanol wettability measures the minimum methanol concentration in a methanol-water mixture required to wet the silica surface. Higher values indicate stronger hydrophobicity. R620 targets 45–55% while R972 specifies ≥40%, meaning R620 offers slightly better moisture resistance.
SEMISIL R620 typically prices 15–25% below AEROSIL R972 on a per-kilogram basis. The cost difference reflects lower brand premium rather than a quality gap — both grades are manufactured via HMDS gas-phase treatment of ~200 m²/g hydrophilic fumed silica.
Yes, both R620 and R972 work as anti-settling and thixotropic agents in epoxy systems at 1–3 wt% loading. The trimethylsilyl surface groups do not react with amine hardeners or interfere with epoxy ring-opening cure chemistry.
For solvent-based coatings and adhesives, 2–4 wt% of either R620 or R972 provides moderate thixotropy. For silicone sealants requiring higher yield stress, loadings of 4–8 wt% are standard. Dispersion quality and shear history affect final rheology more than grade selection at equivalent loading.
Get Samples & TDS
Free samples for qualified buyers · reply within 24h. Tell us how you plan to use Semisil R620 Vs Aerosil R972.